`quality()` answers "is this matchup fair". Callers picking which
comparison to run next need "is this matchup informative", and the two
coincide only for two evenly matched competitors. Without a principled
alternative, downstream code was reaching for hand-rolled heuristics
like `quality * sigma_a^2 * sigma_b^2`, which double-counts uncertainty:
the two factors are not independent.
Adds `expected_information_gain`, the outcome-weighted divergence
between current beliefs and the beliefs each result would produce:
EIG = SUM P(outcome) * KL(posterior_after(outcome) || prior)
Available standalone over `Rating`s, and as
`History::expected_information_gain` using current skills and the
history's own beta, drift and p_draw — so the outcomes it weighs are the
ones that would actually be fitted.
This is the mutual information between the outcome and the skills, which
gives an analytic ceiling: gain cannot exceed the entropy of the thing
being observed, so at most `ln k` nats for k outcomes. That bound is the
sharpest test available, because an acquisition function is unusually
exposed to returning finite, plausible, monotone numbers while being
wrong — it would simply select slightly worse matchups forever. A
prototype of this returned 4.77 nats from a sign error while passing
every monotonicity check; `never_exceeds_the_entropy_of_the_outcome`
catches that class unconditionally.
Measured against the ceiling the values are meaningful rather than
vacuous: 0.382 nats for an even matchup between diffuse priors against
an 0.693 ceiling, falling to 0.013 for a lopsided one and 0.000 for a
hopeless one.
`disagrees_with_the_quality_times_variance_heuristic` pins down that
this is not a monotone transform of the heuristic it replaces — the two
rank a lopsided matchup and a confident even one in opposite orders — so
a later "simplification" cannot quietly revert to it.
Cost is one inference pass per possible outcome, documented on the
public API alongside the shortlist-then-score pattern, so callers do not
discover it in production.
Also folds the duplicated key-gathering in `predict_quality` and
`performances` into one validated `member_skills`.
Refs #39
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ
TrueSkill - Through Time
Rust port of TrueSkillThroughTime.py.
Other implementations
- ttt-scala
- ChessAnalysis #F
- TrueSkillThroughTime.jl
- TrueSkillThroughTime.R
- TrueSkill Through Time: Revisiting the History of Chess
- TrueSkill Through Time. The full scientific documentation
Drift
Skill drift models how a competitor's true skill can change between appearances. Each time they reappear after a gap, their skill uncertainty is widened by the drift model before the new evidence is incorporated.
Drift is represented by the Drift trait (src/drift.rs), generic over the
history's time type:
pub trait Drift<T: Time>: Copy + Debug + Send + Sync {
fn variance_delta(&self, from: &T, to: &T) -> f64;
fn variance_for_elapsed(&self, elapsed: i64) -> f64;
}
Both methods return the amount to add to σ², not to σ. variance_delta
works from two timestamps; variance_for_elapsed takes an already-computed
elapsed count, and is used on the paths that cache it. Gaussian::forget
applies the result entirely in variance space — from_mv(mu, variance() + variance_delta) — taking no square root.
That block is a quotation rather than a doctest. The custom-drift example below is compiled by CI, so it is what actually pins the signature.
ConstantDrift
The built-in ConstantDrift implements a linear random walk — skill uncertainty
grows proportionally to time:
variance_delta = elapsed * γ²
This is the standard TrueSkill Through Time model. Pass a ConstantDrift(gamma)
when constructing a Rating:
use trueskill_tt::{ConstantDrift, Gaussian, Rating};
// gamma = 0.1 means skill can shift ~0.1 per time unit.
let rating: Rating<i64, ConstantDrift> =
Rating::new(Gaussian::from_ms(0.0, 6.0), 1.0, ConstantDrift(0.1));
assert_eq!(rating.drift().0, 0.1);
The type annotation is load-bearing: ConstantDrift implements Drift<T> for
every T: Time, so without it T is ambiguous.
Custom drift
Implement Drift<T> to express any other model. For example, a drift that
saturates after a long absence, with uncertainty growing as the square root of
elapsed time instead of linearly:
use trueskill_tt::{Drift, Gaussian, History, Rating, Time};
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug)]
struct SqrtDrift {
gamma: f64,
}
impl<T: Time> Drift<T> for SqrtDrift {
fn variance_delta(&self, from: &T, to: &T) -> f64 {
let elapsed = from.elapsed_to(to).max(0) as f64;
elapsed.sqrt() * self.gamma * self.gamma
}
fn variance_for_elapsed(&self, elapsed: i64) -> f64 {
(elapsed.max(0) as f64).sqrt() * self.gamma * self.gamma
}
}
// On a single Rating:
let rating: Rating<i64, SqrtDrift> =
Rating::new(Gaussian::from_ms(0.0, 6.0), 1.0, SqrtDrift { gamma: 0.5 });
// Or for a whole History, via the builder:
let history = History::builder().drift(SqrtDrift { gamma: 0.5 }).build();
assert_eq!(rating.beta(), 1.0);
assert_eq!(history.log_evidence(), 0.0);
HistoryBuilder::drift is the only way to set a history's drift model; there is
no gamma() shorthand. The default is ConstantDrift(GAMMA).
Per-competitor drift
A History has one drift model, but individual competitors can scale it.
Member::with_drift_scale(s) multiplies the drift variance that competitor
accumulates, so s is in the same units as gamma: ConstantDrift(g) at
scale s behaves exactly as ConstantDrift(g * s) would, for that competitor
alone.
0.0 pins a competitor still. That is what makes a fixed reference point
expressible in the same graph as moving competitors — a bot at a known
strength, a rating floor, a course difficulty:
use trueskill_tt::{ConstantDrift, Event, History, Member, Outcome, Team};
let mut h = History::builder().drift(ConstantDrift(0.1)).build();
h.add_events(vec![Event {
time: 0,
teams: [
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
// A course does not improve. Pin it, and the round's evidence
// lands on the player instead of being split between the two.
Team::with_members([Member::new("layout_7").with_drift_scale(0.0)]),
]
.into_iter()
.collect(),
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
}])
.unwrap();
h.converge().unwrap();
Like with_prior, the scale is competitor configuration captured at first
appearance — setting it on a key the history already knows has no effect. It
must be finite and non-negative; ingestion otherwise fails with
InferenceError::InvalidParameter.
Note that the fluent EventBuilder (h.event(t).team([...])) sets weights but
not drift_scale or prior; those need the typed Event / Team / Member
shape shown above.
Scored outcomes
Use Outcome::scores([...]) when you have continuous per-team scores rather
than just ranks. Adjacent score margins flow into a MarginFactor that adds
soft Gaussian evidence about the latent performance diff. Configure
HistoryBuilder::score_sigma(σ) to control how much you trust the margins
(smaller σ = more trust).
use trueskill_tt::History;
let mut h = History::builder().score_sigma(2.0).build();
h.event(1)
.team(["alice"])
.team(["bob"])
.scores([21.0, 9.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
h.converge().unwrap();
Prediction
predict_outcome gives the full distribution over finishing orders. Each entry
is a rank vector in the same shape Outcome::ranking takes — equal ranks mean a
tie — so an outcome feeds straight back into inference.
use trueskill_tt::History;
let mut h = History::builder().p_draw(0.1).build();
h.record_winner(&"alice", &"bob", 1).unwrap();
h.converge().unwrap();
let p = h.predict_outcome(&[&[&"alice"], &[&"bob"]]).unwrap();
// Probabilities are exhaustive and disjoint, so they sum to one.
assert!((p.total() - 1.0).abs() < 1e-6);
let (best, likelihood) = p.most_likely().unwrap();
println!("most likely: {best:?} at {likelihood:.3}");
println!("draw: {:.3}", p.probability_of(&[0, 0]));
Supports any number of teams. Because the outcome space grows factorially, the
full distribution is capped at MAX_PREDICTED_TEAMS; two cheaper entry points
stay available at any size:
predict_win_probabilities(teams)—P(team i finishes strictly first), quadratic in team count.predict_ranking(teams, ranks)— one specific finishing order.
Unknown keys are an error, not a silent omission: a team the history has never seen cannot produce a confident-looking probability.
Which match to play next
quality() measures whether a matchup is fair. That is not the same as
whether it is informative, and the two only coincide for two evenly matched
competitors. When each observation costs something, ask
expected_information_gain instead — the outcome-weighted divergence between
what you believe now and what you would believe afterwards.
use trueskill_tt::History;
let mut h = History::builder().build();
for t in 1..=10 {
h.record_winner(&"veteran", &"regular", t).unwrap();
h.record_winner(&"regular", &"veteran", t + 100).unwrap();
}
h.record_winner(&"veteran", &"newcomer", 500).unwrap();
h.converge().unwrap();
let settled = h.expected_information_gain(&[&[&"veteran"], &[&"regular"]]).unwrap();
let unknown = h.expected_information_gain(&[&[&"veteran"], &[&"newcomer"]]).unwrap();
// Playing the newcomer teaches you more than replaying a settled rivalry.
assert!(unknown > settled);
The result is in nats, and is bounded by the entropy of the outcome: at most
ln 2 ≈ 0.693 for a two-way result, ln 3 once draws are possible, ln k for
k outcomes. A value near zero means you already know how it ends.
This costs one full inference pass per possible outcome, so it is far more
expensive than quality(). Scoring every pairing among n competitors is
O(n² × outcomes) passes — shortlist with quality() or
predict_win_probabilities first, then score only the shortlist.
Todo
- Implement approx for Gaussian
- Add more tests from
TrueSkillThroughTime.jl - Generalise a time axis —
Timeis now a trait (Untimed,i64), not an enum - Add examples (
examples/atp.rs,examples/scored.rs) - Add Observer (
Observer/NullObserver) - Benchmark the inference loop (
benches/batch.rs,benches/history_converge.rs,benches/ingest.rs) - N-team
predict_outcomewith draw mass, andexpected_information_gain - Cross-check
quality()against sublee/trueskill — N-group support works and is covered by invariants, but no reference values are asserted
License
Licensed under either of
- Apache License, Version 2.0 (LICENSE-APACHE or http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0)
- MIT license (LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
at your option.
Contribution
Unless you explicitly state otherwise, any contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the work by you, as defined in the Apache-2.0 license, shall be dual licensed as above, without any additional terms or conditions.