Files
trueskill-tt/tests/properties.rs
T
logaritmiskandClaude Opus 5 35d7512557 fix(test): the ingestion-order property was comparing two truncated fits
`ingestion_order_does_not_change_the_answer` failed with a 1.2e-6 gap in
mu and read as a violation of the invariant. It was not. Both sides ran
`max_iter: 200` against `epsilon: 1e-10`, and the batched side stopped
at the cap with a step of 3.4e-9 — so the test compared two fits that
had not converged and attributed the difference to ingestion order.

Raised to 20_000, at which both converge and the property holds. Runtime
is unchanged at 0.05s, because converging is what the iterations were
for.

The test now asserts `report.converged` on both sides before comparing.
That is the part worth keeping: any test that compares two fits for
equality is measuring truncation unless it first establishes that both
reached a fixed point. `ingestion_equivalence.rs` already did this;
`properties.rs` did not.

Found because c12bc83 made `ConvergenceReport` `#[must_use]`, which is
the same failure #50 describes — a short fit is wrong by a little and
looks entirely plausible. The blanket `let _ =` that commit applied to
78 call sites was too blunt here: binding the report to `_` silenced the
one signal that would have caught this, in a test whose whole purpose is
to compare two fits.

Refs #50

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ
2026-09-08 01:20:48 +02:00

184 lines
6.4 KiB
Rust

//! Property-based tests over generated histories.
//!
//! The golden suite pins exact values against the Python/Julia reference on a
//! handful of fixtures. These pin *invariants* over inputs nobody wrote by
//! hand, which is where the defects this crate has actually shipped were
//! hiding: a linear evidence product that underflowed only past ~1000 teams,
//! and a batching path no golden exercised because every golden ingests in one
//! call.
mod common;
use common::assert_finite;
use proptest::prelude::*;
use smallvec::smallvec;
use trueskill_tt::{ConvergenceOptions, Event, History, Member, Outcome, Team};
/// Distinct competitors, so no event pits someone against themselves.
fn pairs() -> impl Strategy<Value = Vec<(usize, usize)>> {
prop::collection::vec((0usize..8, 0usize..8), 1..24)
.prop_map(|v| v.into_iter().filter(|(a, b)| a != b).collect::<Vec<_>>())
.prop_filter("needs at least one valid pair", |v| !v.is_empty())
}
const KEYS: [&str; 8] = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h"];
fn history_from(games: &[(usize, usize)]) -> History {
let mut h = History::builder()
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
// 200 was not enough: the batched side stopped at the cap with a
// step of 3.4e-9, so this test was comparing two truncated fits and
// attributing the gap to ingestion order.
max_iter: 20_000,
epsilon: 1e-10,
..ConvergenceOptions::default()
})
.build();
let events: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = games
.iter()
.enumerate()
.map(|(i, &(a, b))| Event {
time: i as i64 + 1,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[a])]),
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[b])]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
})
.collect();
h.add_events(events).unwrap();
h
}
proptest! {
#![proptest_config(ProptestConfig::with_cases(48))]
/// Whatever the schedule of games, convergence must not produce NaN or an
/// improper posterior. `converge` returns `NonFiniteResult` rather than
/// silently reporting a NaN step as converged, so a break shows up here as
/// either an Err or a non-finite curve point.
#[test]
fn converged_posteriors_are_always_finite(games in pairs()) {
let mut h = history_from(&games);
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
for key in KEYS {
for (time, g) in h.learning_curve(key) {
assert_finite(g, &format!("{key} at t={time}"));
}
}
}
/// Log-evidence is a log probability: finite, and never above zero.
///
/// The linear-product implementation this replaced underflowed to zero on
/// long chains, making `ln(0)` = -inf — finite-ness is the property that
/// would have caught it.
#[test]
fn log_evidence_is_a_finite_log_probability(games in pairs()) {
let mut h = history_from(&games);
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
let batch = h.log_evidence();
let filtered = h.filtered_log_evidence();
prop_assert!(batch.is_finite(), "batch log-evidence {batch} is not finite");
prop_assert!(batch <= 0.0, "batch log-evidence {batch} exceeds zero");
prop_assert!(filtered.is_finite(), "filtered log-evidence {filtered} is not finite");
prop_assert!(filtered <= 0.0, "filtered log-evidence {filtered} exceeds zero");
}
/// Filtered estimates must not depend on whether `converge` has run — the
/// property the whole forward-only design rests on.
#[test]
fn filtered_evidence_is_invariant_to_convergence(games in pairs()) {
let mut h = history_from(&games);
let before = h.filtered_log_evidence();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
let after = h.filtered_log_evidence();
prop_assert!(
(before - after).abs() < 1e-8,
"filtered evidence moved across converge(): {before} -> {after}"
);
}
/// Ingesting the same games one at a time must reach the same fixed point
/// as ingesting them in one call.
#[test]
fn ingestion_order_does_not_change_the_answer(games in pairs()) {
let batched = {
let mut h = history_from(&games);
let report = h.converge().unwrap();
prop_assert!(
report.converged,
"batched side stopped at {} iterations with step {:?}; comparing \
two fits that have not converged measures truncation, not order",
report.iterations,
report.final_step
);
h
};
let incremental = {
let mut h = History::builder()
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
max_iter: 20_000,
epsilon: 1e-10,
..ConvergenceOptions::default()
})
.build();
for (i, &(a, b)) in games.iter().enumerate() {
h.add_events([Event {
time: i as i64 + 1,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[a])]),
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[b])]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
}])
.unwrap();
}
let report = h.converge().unwrap();
prop_assert!(
report.converged,
"incremental side stopped at {} iterations with step {:?}",
report.iterations,
report.final_step
);
h
};
for key in KEYS {
let one = batched.current_skill(key);
let other = incremental.current_skill(key);
match (one, other) {
(Some(one), Some(other)) => {
prop_assert!(
(one.mu() - other.mu()).abs() < 1e-6
&& (one.sigma() - other.sigma()).abs() < 1e-6,
"{key}: batched mu={} sigma={}, incremental mu={} sigma={}",
one.mu(),
one.sigma(),
other.mu(),
other.sigma()
);
}
(None, None) => {}
_ => prop_assert!(false, "{key} present in only one history"),
}
}
}
}