Files
trueskill-tt/tests/registration.rs
T
logaritmiskandClaude Opus 5 b553c630f5 refactor!: K comes first in History, HistoryBuilder and Joint
`K` is the one type parameter people change, and it was last. Naming a
history in a struct field meant writing all four to say one thing:

    struct Ladder { history: History<i64, ConstantDrift, NullObserver, String> }
    struct Analysis<'h> { joint: Joint<'h, i64, ConstantDrift, NullObserver, &'static str> }

Now:

    struct Ladder { history: History<String> }
    struct Analysis<'h> { joint: Joint<'h> }

`History<K, T, D, O>`, all four defaulted. Bounds may reference later
parameters, so `D: Drift<T> = ConstantDrift` is legal in third position.
`Joint` gains the same defaults, so `Joint<'h, String>` spells it.

72 call sites swapped, and the reorder makes most of them shorter: 18
now read `History<String>` and the `&'static str` ones read `History`.
The two turbofished builders shrink from
`HistoryBuilder::<Untimed, _, _, String>::new()` to
`HistoryBuilder::<String, Untimed>::new()`.

`Joint` keeps `O` structurally, defaulted rather than removed. #72 notes
it never touches the observer, which is true — but it borrows the whole
`&'h History<K, T, D, O>` and calls `History::resolve_terms`, so dropping
the parameter means either a view type or moving that method off
`History`. The default already buys the entire user-visible benefit,
which was the spelling.

Refs #72.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ
2026-09-10 06:49:22 +02:00

339 lines
9.9 KiB
Rust

//! Configuring a competitor before anything is observed about them.
//!
//! The configuration a competitor needs is usually a property of the domain —
//! "every layout is static" — not of whichever event happens to mention them
//! first. Stating it per-event meant every ingestion path had to remember it,
//! and two of the four paths could not state it at all.
use smallvec::smallvec;
use trueskill_tt::{
ConstantDrift, ConvergenceOptions, Event, Gaussian, History, InferenceError, Member, Outcome,
Team,
};
type H = History;
const PINNED: Gaussian = Gaussian::from_ms(2.0, 0.5);
fn history() -> H {
History::builder()
.mu(0.0)
.sigma(6.0)
.beta(1.0)
.score_sigma(2.0)
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(0.5))
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
max_iter: 20_000,
epsilon: 1e-13,
alpha: 1.0,
})
.build()
}
fn duel(
a: &'static str,
b: &'static str,
t: i64,
m: Option<Member<&'static str>>,
) -> Event<i64, &'static str> {
Event {
time: t,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new(a)]),
Team::with_members([m.unwrap_or_else(|| Member::new(b))]),
],
outcome: Outcome::scores([5.0, 2.0]),
}
}
fn skills(h: &H) -> Vec<(&'static str, Gaussian)> {
["player", "layout"]
.into_iter()
.map(|k| (k, h.current_skill(&k).unwrap()))
.collect()
}
/// The headline contract.
#[test]
fn registering_matches_configuring_on_the_first_event() {
let configured = {
let mut h = history();
h.add_events(vec![
duel(
"player",
"layout",
1,
Some(
Member::new("layout")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PINNED),
),
),
duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
])
.unwrap();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
h
};
let registered = {
let mut h = history();
h.register(
Member::new("layout")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PINNED),
)
.unwrap();
h.add_events(vec![
duel("player", "layout", 1, None),
duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
])
.unwrap();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
h
};
for ((k, a), (_, b)) in skills(&configured).into_iter().zip(skills(&registered)) {
assert_eq!(a.mu(), b.mu(), "{k} mu");
assert_eq!(a.variance(), b.variance(), "{k} variance");
}
}
/// The case `EventBuilder` and the typed path cannot reach: a competitor whose
/// first appearance arrives through the two-argument convenience route.
#[test]
fn registration_reaches_a_competitor_first_seen_through_record_winner() {
let mut h = history();
h.register(
Member::new("layout")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PINNED),
)
.unwrap();
h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 2).unwrap();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
let rating = h.rating(&"layout").unwrap();
assert_eq!(rating.drift_scale(), 0.0);
assert_eq!(rating.prior().mu(), PINNED.mu());
// Pinned means pinned: no drift across the two slices.
let curve = h.learning_curve(&"layout").unwrap();
assert!(curve.len() >= 2);
let widest = curve
.iter()
.map(|(_, g)| g.sigma())
.fold(f64::MIN, f64::max);
let narrowest = curve
.iter()
.map(|(_, g)| g.sigma())
.fold(f64::MAX, f64::min);
assert!(
(widest - narrowest) / widest < 1e-9,
"{narrowest} .. {widest}"
);
}
#[test]
fn registering_a_known_competitor_is_an_error() {
let mut h = history();
h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
let err = h.register(Member::new("layout")).unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(err, InferenceError::AlreadyRegistered { .. }),
"{err:?}"
);
}
#[test]
fn registering_twice_is_an_error() {
let mut h = history();
h.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
.unwrap();
let err = h
.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(1.0))
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(err, InferenceError::AlreadyRegistered { .. }),
"{err:?}"
);
// The first registration stands.
assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
}
/// `weight` is per-event and meaningless here, so it is rejected rather than
/// dropped — dropping it silently is the defect class this whole area keeps
/// producing.
#[test]
fn a_weight_on_a_registration_is_rejected() {
let mut h = history();
let err = h
.register(Member::new("layout").with_weight(0.5))
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(err, InferenceError::InvalidParameter { name: "weight", .. }),
"{err:?}"
);
}
#[test]
fn an_invalid_drift_scale_on_a_registration_is_rejected() {
for bad in [-1.0, f64::NAN, f64::INFINITY] {
let mut h = history();
let err = h
.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(bad))
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::InvalidParameter {
name: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"{bad}: {err:?}"
);
}
}
/// Registration makes the fit independent of the order events arrive in,
/// which is what the per-event shape could not guarantee.
#[test]
fn registration_makes_the_fit_order_independent() {
let build = |reversed: bool| {
let mut h = history();
h.register(
Member::new("layout")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PINNED),
)
.unwrap();
let mut events = vec![
duel("player", "layout", 1, None),
duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
duel("player", "layout", 3, None),
];
if reversed {
events.reverse();
}
h.add_events(events).unwrap();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
h
};
let forward = build(false);
let backward = build(true);
for ((k, a), (_, b)) in skills(&forward).into_iter().zip(skills(&backward)) {
assert_eq!(a.mu(), b.mu(), "{k} mu");
assert_eq!(a.variance(), b.variance(), "{k} variance");
}
}
/// `rating` is the read-back that made a configuration mistake detectable from
/// outside the crate at all. Every other accessor reports what inference
/// inferred; this reports what it was told.
#[test]
fn rating_reads_back_what_was_stored() {
let mut h = history();
assert!(h.rating(&"nobody").is_none());
h.register(
Member::new("layout")
.with_drift_scale(0.25)
.with_prior(PINNED),
)
.unwrap();
let r = h.rating(&"layout").unwrap();
assert_eq!(r.drift_scale(), 0.25);
assert_eq!(r.prior().mu(), PINNED.mu());
assert_eq!(r.prior().variance(), PINNED.variance());
// A competitor created by an event reports the history defaults.
h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
assert_eq!(h.rating(&"player").unwrap().drift_scale(), 1.0);
}
/// The decision this issue turned on: two different values for one competitor
/// are an error whether they arrive in one batch or two.
///
/// Last-write-wins across batches cut against the invariant
/// `tests/ingestion_equivalence.rs` protects — the same contradictory events
/// errored when batched and succeeded, order-dependently, one at a time.
mod conflicting_configuration {
use super::*;
fn seed(scale: f64) -> Event<i64, &'static str> {
duel(
"player",
"layout",
1,
Some(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(scale)),
)
}
#[test]
fn within_one_batch_is_an_error() {
let mut h = history();
let err = h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0), seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig {
field: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"{err:?}"
);
}
#[test]
fn across_two_batches_is_also_an_error() {
let mut h = history();
h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
let err = h.add_events(vec![seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig {
field: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"{err:?}"
);
// Rejected before anything mutates: the first declaration stands.
assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
}
/// Repeating the *same* value stays inert, which is the expected shape
/// when the configuration is a property of the domain.
#[test]
fn repeating_the_same_value_is_inert() {
let mut h = history();
h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
}
/// A registration and a later event that agree are fine; one that
/// disagrees is the same error.
#[test]
fn a_registration_conflicts_with_a_later_event() {
let mut h = history();
h.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
.unwrap();
h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
let mut h2 = history();
h2.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
.unwrap();
let err = h2.add_events(vec![seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(err, InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig { .. }),
"{err:?}"
);
}
}