Files
trueskill-tt/tests/drift_scale.rs
T
logaritmiskandClaude Opus 5 8dff7513f7 fix!: seal ConstantDrift's field so gamma can be validated
`gamma` enters only as `gamma * gamma`, so the sign was squared away:
measured against the old public-field form, `ConstantDrift(-0.0833)`
produced results bit identical to `ConstantDrift(0.0833)`. The sign was
neither rejected nor honoured — it vanished.

It could not be checked while the field was a public tuple position,
because there was nothing to intercept. Validating inside
`variance_for_elapsed` would have been worse: it runs in the sweep, so a
construction-time mistake would panic mid-inference, and `Gaussian::from_ms`
is a worked example of why that is the wrong place — rejecting NaN there
turned the NonFiniteResult reporting path into a crash.

So `ConstantDrift::new` is the only way in and it checks, with `gamma()`
to read the value back. 129 call sites rewritten across src, tests,
benches, examples and the README. The dated plan and spec documents under
docs/superpowers are left alone: they record what was built at the time,
and rewriting them would falsify that.

tests/constructor_validation.rs is the more valuable half. This defect
class was closed three times in one session and reopened twice, because
each fix validated the layer it had just touched and inferred the rest —
`HistoryBuilder`, then `Game`'s own entry points, then the constructors
beneath both. A per-site fix cannot notice the site nobody thought of, so
that file enumerates every public entry point taking a magnitude and
asserts each refuses negative and non-finite values.

It found an eleventh defect on its first run: `HistoryBuilder::score_sigma`
accepted infinity, because `inf > 0.0` is true and the assert only tested
positivity. Fixed, and its own `should_panic` message updated to match.

`Gaussian::from_ms` is deliberately exempt from the non-finite half, for
the reason above: a broken fit produces a NaN sigma legitimately and
`converge` must be allowed to report it.

The convergence-level drift-variance check stays and is now tested through
a custom `Drift` implementation, since `ConstantDrift` can no longer reach
it. That check is the only thing standing between a third-party `Drift`
and a NaN fit.

BREAKING CHANGE: `ConstantDrift`'s field is private. Replace
`ConstantDrift(x)` with `ConstantDrift::new(x)`, and `drift().0` with
`drift().gamma()`. `HistoryBuilder::score_sigma` now rejects infinity.

Closes #65

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ
2026-09-09 19:11:57 +02:00

500 lines
16 KiB
Rust

//! Per-competitor drift scaling via `Member::with_drift_scale`.
//!
//! The scale multiplies the *variance* the history's `Drift` contributes for
//! that competitor, so `scale` is in the same units as `gamma`:
//! `ConstantDrift::new(g)` at `scale = s` behaves as `ConstantDrift::new(g * s)` would.
//! `scale = 0.0` pins a competitor still — an anchor, a rating floor, a course
//! difficulty — while everyone around them keeps drifting.
use smallvec::smallvec;
use trueskill_tt::{
ConstantDrift, ConvergenceOptions, Event, Gaussian, History, InferenceError, Member,
NullObserver, Outcome, Team,
};
type Fit = History<i64, ConstantDrift, NullObserver, &'static str>;
const CONVERGENCE: ConvergenceOptions = ConvergenceOptions {
max_iter: 64,
epsilon: 1e-9,
alpha: 1.0,
};
/// Two events separated by a long gap, so drift has room to matter.
fn distant_pair(anchor_scale: Option<f64>) -> Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> {
let anchor = |s: Option<f64>| match s {
Some(scale) => Member::new("anchor").with_drift_scale(scale),
None => Member::new("anchor"),
};
vec![
Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([anchor(anchor_scale)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
Event {
time: 1000,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([anchor(anchor_scale)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(1, 2),
},
]
}
fn fit(events: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>>, gamma: f64) -> Fit {
let mut h = History::builder()
.mu(25.0)
.sigma(25.0 / 3.0)
.beta(25.0 / 6.0)
.p_draw(0.0)
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(gamma))
.convergence(CONVERGENCE)
.build();
h.add_events(events).unwrap();
let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
h
}
fn curve(h: &Fit, key: &str) -> Vec<(i64, Gaussian)> {
let mut c = h.learning_curves().remove(key).expect("key in curves");
c.sort_by_key(|(t, _)| *t);
c
}
/// A competitor at `scale = 0.0` is one latent skill observed twice, so the
/// posterior is the same distribution at both times — and strictly tighter
/// than the same competitor left to drift.
#[test]
fn zero_scale_pins_a_competitor_still() {
let pinned = fit(distant_pair(Some(0.0)), 25.0 / 300.0);
let drifting = fit(distant_pair(None), 25.0 / 300.0);
let pinned_curve = curve(&pinned, "anchor");
assert_eq!(pinned_curve.len(), 2);
let (t0, first) = pinned_curve[0];
let (t1, second) = pinned_curve[1];
assert_eq!((t0, t1), (0, 1000));
assert!(
(first.sigma() - second.sigma()).abs() < 1e-9,
"a pinned competitor's uncertainty must not move between t=0 and t=1000: \
{} vs {}",
first.sigma(),
second.sigma()
);
assert!(
(first.mu() - second.mu()).abs() < 1e-9,
"a pinned competitor's mean must not move: {} vs {}",
first.mu(),
second.mu()
);
let drifting_curve = curve(&drifting, "anchor");
assert!(
drifting_curve[0].1.sigma() > first.sigma() + 1e-6,
"drift must leave the anchor less certain than pinning does: {} vs {}",
drifting_curve[0].1.sigma(),
first.sigma()
);
}
/// The scale is composable with `gamma`: scaling every competitor by `s` is
/// exactly the same fit as scaling the history's drift by `s`.
#[test]
fn scale_is_equivalent_to_scaling_gamma() {
let scaled: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = vec![
Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("a").with_drift_scale(0.5)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("b").with_drift_scale(0.5)]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
Event {
time: 400,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("b").with_drift_scale(0.5)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("a").with_drift_scale(0.5)]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
];
let plain: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = vec![
Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("a")]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("b")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
Event {
time: 400,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("b")]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("a")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
];
let by_scale = fit(scaled, 0.3);
let by_gamma = fit(plain, 0.15);
for key in ["a", "b"] {
let lhs = curve(&by_scale, key);
let rhs = curve(&by_gamma, key);
assert_eq!(lhs.len(), rhs.len());
for ((t_l, g_l), (t_r, g_r)) in lhs.iter().zip(rhs.iter()) {
assert_eq!(t_l, t_r);
assert!(
(g_l.mu() - g_r.mu()).abs() < 1e-9 && (g_l.sigma() - g_r.sigma()).abs() < 1e-9,
"ConstantDrift::new(0.3) at scale 0.5 must equal ConstantDrift::new(0.15) for {key} at \
t={t_l}: ({}, {}) vs ({}, {})",
g_l.mu(),
g_l.sigma(),
g_r.mu(),
g_r.sigma()
);
}
}
}
/// `None` means 1.0: an explicit unit scale changes nothing.
#[test]
fn unset_scale_matches_an_explicit_unit_scale() {
let implicit = fit(distant_pair(None), 25.0 / 300.0);
let explicit = fit(distant_pair(Some(1.0)), 25.0 / 300.0);
for key in ["anchor", "player"] {
let lhs = curve(&implicit, key);
let rhs = curve(&explicit, key);
assert_eq!(lhs.len(), rhs.len());
for ((t_l, g_l), (t_r, g_r)) in lhs.iter().zip(rhs.iter()) {
assert_eq!(t_l, t_r);
assert_eq!(
(g_l.mu(), g_l.sigma()),
(g_r.mu(), g_r.sigma()),
"an explicit scale of 1.0 must be bit-identical to leaving it unset, \
for {key} at t={t_l}"
);
}
}
}
/// The use case from the issue: a static difficulty alongside drifting players,
/// in one graph. The anchor must hold still without absorbing drift through its
/// neighbours, and everything must stay finite.
#[test]
fn mixed_static_and_drifting_graph_converges() {
let mut events: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = Vec::new();
let players = ["p0", "p1", "p2"];
for (i, p) in players.iter().cycle().take(9).enumerate() {
events.push(Event {
time: (i as i64) * 100,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new(*p)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0)]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner((i % 2) as u32, 2),
});
}
let mut h = History::builder()
.mu(25.0)
.sigma(25.0 / 3.0)
.beta(25.0 / 6.0)
.p_draw(0.0)
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(25.0 / 300.0))
.convergence(CONVERGENCE)
.build();
h.add_events(events).unwrap();
let report = h.converge().unwrap();
assert!(report.converged, "mixed graph must converge: {report:?}");
let curves = h.learning_curves();
for (key, points) in &curves {
for (t, g) in points {
assert!(
g.mu().is_finite() && g.sigma().is_finite() && g.sigma() > 0.0,
"{key} at t={t} is not a usable posterior: mu={}, sigma={}",
g.mu(),
g.sigma()
);
}
}
let layout = curve(&h, "layout");
assert_eq!(layout.len(), 9);
let (_, first) = layout[0];
for (t, g) in &layout {
assert!(
(g.sigma() - first.sigma()).abs() < 1e-9,
"a static layout must not accumulate uncertainty; t={t} has sigma {} vs {}",
g.sigma(),
first.sigma()
);
}
let p0 = curve(&h, "p0");
assert!(
p0.last().unwrap().1.sigma() > 0.0,
"a drifting player should still have a proper posterior"
);
}
fn reject(scale: f64) -> InferenceError {
let mut h = History::builder()
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(25.0 / 300.0))
.build();
let events: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = vec![Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("a").with_drift_scale(scale)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("b")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
}];
h.add_events(events)
.expect_err("an out-of-range drift_scale must be rejected")
}
#[test]
fn negative_scale_is_rejected() {
assert_eq!(
reject(-1.0),
InferenceError::InvalidParameter {
name: "drift_scale",
value: -1.0
}
);
}
#[test]
fn non_finite_scale_is_rejected() {
for scale in [f64::NAN, f64::INFINITY, f64::NEG_INFINITY] {
assert!(
matches!(
reject(scale),
InferenceError::InvalidParameter {
name: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"a drift_scale of {scale} must be rejected as an invalid parameter"
);
}
}
/// The scale must reach the filtering pass too, not just `converge()`.
/// `filtered_learning_curves` runs its own drift application, so a pinned
/// competitor has to stay pinned there as well.
#[test]
fn zero_scale_pins_a_competitor_in_the_filtered_pass() {
let pinned = fit(distant_pair(Some(0.0)), 25.0 / 300.0);
let drifting = fit(distant_pair(None), 25.0 / 300.0);
let filtered = |h: &Fit| -> Vec<(i64, Gaussian)> {
let mut c = h
.filtered_learning_curves()
.remove("anchor")
.expect("anchor in filtered curves");
c.sort_by_key(|(t, _)| *t);
c
};
let pinned_curve = filtered(&pinned);
let drifting_curve = filtered(&drifting);
assert_eq!(pinned_curve.len(), 2);
assert_eq!(drifting_curve.len(), 2);
assert!(
pinned_curve[1].1.sigma() < pinned_curve[0].1.sigma(),
"a pinned competitor's filtered uncertainty must shrink with a second \
observation, not be re-inflated by drift: {} then {}",
pinned_curve[0].1.sigma(),
pinned_curve[1].1.sigma()
);
assert!(
pinned_curve[1].1.sigma() < drifting_curve[1].1.sigma() - 1e-6,
"pinning must leave the filtered estimate tighter than drifting does: \
{} vs {}",
pinned_curve[1].1.sigma(),
drifting_curve[1].1.sigma()
);
}
/// `drift_scale` is competitor configuration, and configuration supplied for a
/// competitor the history already knows is now *applied* rather than dropped.
///
/// This test previously asserted the opposite. It was written as a deliberate
/// change-detector — "moving the capture would be a visible break, not a silent
/// one" — and that is exactly what happened: the capture moved, and the
/// assertion inverted rather than being deleted.
///
/// Because configuration lives on the competitor and `converge` refits from
/// competitor state, a late pin applies to the *whole* history, not just to
/// events after it. So a scale set on the second batch must reach the same fit
/// as one set from the very first event.
#[test]
fn drift_scale_applies_when_set_after_first_appearance() {
let mut late = History::builder()
.mu(25.0)
.sigma(25.0 / 3.0)
.beta(25.0 / 6.0)
.p_draw(0.0)
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(25.0 / 300.0))
.convergence(CONVERGENCE)
.build();
// First batch creates "anchor" with the default scale.
late.add_events(vec![Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("anchor")]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
}])
.unwrap();
// Second batch asks for a pin. No longer too late.
late.add_events(vec![Event {
time: 1000,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("anchor").with_drift_scale(0.0)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(1, 2),
}])
.unwrap();
let _ = late.converge().unwrap();
let applied = curve(&late, "anchor");
let pinned_from_the_start = curve(&fit(distant_pair(Some(0.0)), 25.0 / 300.0), "anchor");
let never_pinned = curve(&fit(distant_pair(None), 25.0 / 300.0), "anchor");
for ((t_l, g_l), (t_r, g_r)) in applied.iter().zip(pinned_from_the_start.iter()) {
assert_eq!(t_l, t_r);
assert!(
(g_l.sigma() - g_r.sigma()).abs() < 1e-9,
"a late pin should refit the whole history: t={t_l}, {} vs {}",
g_l.sigma(),
g_r.sigma()
);
}
// And it must actually have done something.
assert!(
applied
.iter()
.zip(never_pinned.iter())
.any(|((_, a), (_, b))| (a.sigma() - b.sigma()).abs() > 1e-9),
"the pin had no effect at all — the silent drop is back"
);
}
/// Re-declaring the same configuration must be inert. This is the shape a
/// caller gets when the configuration is a property of the domain — "layouts
/// are static" — so every ingestion path repeats it on every event.
///
/// Both histories see exactly the same events; only how many times the scale
/// is declared differs.
#[test]
fn repeating_the_same_configuration_changes_nothing() {
let events = |declare_every_time: bool| {
let anchor = |first: bool| {
if first || declare_every_time {
Member::new("anchor").with_drift_scale(0.0)
} else {
Member::new("anchor")
}
};
vec![
Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([anchor(true)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
Event {
time: 1000,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([anchor(false)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(1, 2),
},
]
};
let once = curve(&fit(events(false), 25.0 / 300.0), "anchor");
let every_time = curve(&fit(events(true), 25.0 / 300.0), "anchor");
for ((t_l, a), (t_r, b)) in once.iter().zip(every_time.iter()) {
assert_eq!(t_l, t_r);
assert!(
(a.sigma() - b.sigma()).abs() < 1e-12,
"t={t_l}: declaring the same scale repeatedly changed the fit, {} vs {}",
a.sigma(),
b.sigma()
);
}
}
#[test]
fn a_batch_that_contradicts_itself_is_rejected() {
let mut h = History::builder().convergence(CONVERGENCE).build();
let err = h
.add_events(vec![
Event {
time: 0,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("anchor").with_drift_scale(0.0)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
Event {
time: 1,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("anchor").with_drift_scale(1.0)]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
],
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
},
])
.expect_err("two different scales for one competitor in one batch");
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig {
field: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"got {err:?}"
);
}