Files
trueskill-tt/tests/event_builder_members.rs
T
logaritmiskandClaude Opus 5 85c4d0d87d fix!: correct eight wrong # Errors sections and seal the error variants
Documentation (#78). Every item below was measured against the code
rather than read:

- `expected_information_gain` and `predict_ranking` had `# Errors`
  immediately followed by `# Preconditions`, with the error list stranded
  at the bottom of the latter — rustdoc rendered a BLANK Errors section on
  both. The heading now sits with its content.
- `predict_outcome`, `predict_ranking` and the free
  `expected_information_gain` all omitted `GridTooCoarse`.
- `predict_margin` claimed `JointUnavailable` "if the LATEST slice holds
  ranked events". Measured with an early ranked slice and a late scored
  one: it fails. The condition is *any* slice.
- `add_events` documented three errors and can return five more; it also
  claimed a weights `MismatchedShape` that is unreachable through it,
  since weights arrive one-per-`Member`. That check belongs to
  `EventBuilder::weights`, and the doc now says so.
- `converge` and `converge_partial` both omitted the drift-variance
  `InvalidParameter`.

`History` gains a hand-written `Debug` (#76). Summarising, not
exhaustive — a derived one would print every competitor's skill at every
slice. It exists because without it a consumer cannot `#[derive(Debug)]`
on any struct holding a `History`, which is how both known consumers
store one.

`#[non_exhaustive]` on all 17 `InferenceError` struct variants and on
`Outcome::Scored` (#74). The enum carried the attribute; no variant did,
so adding a field to any of them — and downstream construction of any of
them — were both in the public contract. This crate added two variants in
two days.

The options structs are deliberately NOT sealed. `ConvergenceOptions` and
`GameOptions` are constructed by struct literal at 65 sites of which only
8 use `..default()`, and specifying all three convergence fields is a
natural complete statement rather than a partial one. That is a real
trade-off rather than an oversight, and it is left as a decision on #74.

Also spells `UnknownKeys::Reject` explicitly at both sites that
wildcarded it. `#[non_exhaustive]` on your own enum gives no exhaustiveness
safety net if you then match `_`.

Sealing the variants pushed ten test sites from constructing errors to
`matches!`, which is the better assertion anyway — an `assert_eq!` against
a constructed error breaks whenever a field is added, which is the exact
fragility the attribute exists to prevent.

BREAKING CHANGE: `InferenceError`'s struct variants and `Outcome::Scored`
are `#[non_exhaustive]` — downstream patterns need `..` and downstream
construction is no longer possible.

Refs #78, #76, #74

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ
2026-09-09 20:49:07 +02:00

195 lines
5.9 KiB
Rust

//! `EventBuilder::members` must reach exactly what the typed path reaches.
//!
//! Before this existed, `EventBuilder` could set weights and nothing else, so
//! `prior` and `drift_scale` were expressible only through `Event`/`Team`/
//! `Member` + `add_events`. Which ingestion route a competitor arrived through
//! decided whether it could be configured at all.
use smallvec::smallvec;
use trueskill_tt::{
ConstantDrift, ConvergenceOptions, Event, Gaussian, History, InferenceError, Member, Outcome,
Team,
};
type H = History<i64, ConstantDrift, trueskill_tt::NullObserver, &'static str>;
fn history() -> H {
History::builder()
.mu(0.0)
.sigma(6.0)
.beta(1.0)
.score_sigma(2.0)
.drift(ConstantDrift::new(0.5))
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
max_iter: 20_000,
epsilon: 1e-13,
alpha: 1.0,
})
.build()
}
const PRIOR: Gaussian = Gaussian::from_ms(3.0, 1.5);
/// The contract that makes the escape hatch worth having: same configuration,
/// same fit, bit for bit.
#[test]
fn members_matches_the_typed_path_exactly() {
let mut typed = history();
typed
.add_events(vec![Event {
time: 1,
teams: smallvec![
Team::with_members([Member::new("player")]),
Team::with_members([Member::new("layout_7")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PRIOR)]),
],
outcome: Outcome::scores([5.0, 2.0]),
}])
.unwrap();
assert!(typed.converge().unwrap().converged);
let mut fluent = history();
fluent
.event(1)
.team(["player"])
.members([Member::new("layout_7")
.with_drift_scale(0.0)
.with_prior(PRIOR)])
.scores([5.0, 2.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
assert!(fluent.converge().unwrap().converged);
for key in ["player", "layout_7"] {
let a = typed.current_skill(&key).unwrap();
let b = fluent.current_skill(&key).unwrap();
assert_eq!(a.pi(), b.pi(), "{key} pi");
assert_eq!(a.tau(), b.tau(), "{key} tau");
}
}
/// The configuration has to actually take effect, not merely round-trip: a
/// competitor pinned with `drift_scale = 0.0` must not move across slices,
/// where an unpinned one does.
///
/// The comparison is against a control rather than against a fixed epsilon.
/// Pinned marginals are not bit-identical across slices — each slice combines
/// its own forward and backward messages, so the arithmetic order differs and
/// the last bit moves. What "pinned" promises is that no drift variance
/// accumulates, and the control is what makes that measurable.
#[test]
fn a_drift_scale_set_through_members_is_applied() {
fn spread(h: &H, key: &'static str) -> f64 {
let curve = h.learning_curve(&key);
assert!(curve.len() >= 2, "{key}: expected several appearances");
let (lo, hi) = curve.iter().fold((f64::MAX, f64::MIN), |(lo, hi), (_, g)| {
(lo.min(g.sigma()), hi.max(g.sigma()))
});
(hi - lo) / hi
}
let mut h = history();
for t in 1..=4 {
h.event(t)
.team(["player"])
.members([Member::new("pinned").with_drift_scale(0.0)])
.scores([5.0, 2.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
// Same shape, no pinning: the control.
h.event(t)
.team(["rival"])
.team(["drifting"])
.scores([5.0, 2.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
}
assert!(h.converge().unwrap().converged);
let pinned = spread(&h, "pinned");
let drifting = spread(&h, "drifting");
assert!(pinned < 1e-9, "pinned competitor moved: {pinned:e}");
assert!(
drifting > 1e-3,
"control did not move, so the test proves nothing: {drifting:e}"
);
}
/// `weights` still applies to a team added through `members`, and still
/// records a mismatch rather than partially applying it.
#[test]
fn weights_still_guards_a_members_team() {
let mut h = history();
let err = h
.event(1)
.team(["a"])
.members([Member::new("b"), Member::new("c")])
.weights([1.0])
.winner(0)
.commit()
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::MismatchedShape {
kind: "weights",
expected: 2,
got: 1,
..
}
),
"{err:?}"
);
assert!(h.current_skill(&"b").is_none(), "nothing may reach history");
}
/// An invalid `drift_scale` surfaces from `commit`, not from a panic and not
/// silently.
#[test]
fn an_invalid_drift_scale_surfaces_from_commit() {
for bad in [-1.0, f64::NAN, f64::INFINITY] {
let mut h = history();
let err = h
.event(1)
.team(["a"])
.members([Member::new("b").with_drift_scale(bad)])
.winner(0)
.commit()
.unwrap_err();
assert!(
matches!(
err,
InferenceError::InvalidParameter {
name: "drift_scale",
..
}
),
"{bad}: {err:?}"
);
assert!(h.current_skill(&"b").is_none(), "{bad} reached the history");
}
}
/// `members` and `team` compose in either order.
#[test]
fn members_and_team_interleave() {
let mut h = history();
h.event(1)
.members([Member::new("a").with_prior(PRIOR)])
.team(["b"])
.scores([3.0, 1.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
h.event(2)
.team(["b"])
.members([Member::new("c").with_prior(PRIOR)])
.scores([2.0, 4.0])
.commit()
.unwrap();
assert!(h.converge().unwrap().converged);
for key in ["a", "b", "c"] {
assert!(h.current_skill(&key).is_some(), "{key} missing");
}
}