fix!: per-key queries report unknown keys instead of a plausible constant

Two accessors answered a question about a key the history had never seen
with a well-formed value indistinguishable from a real answer.

`log_evidence_for` filter_map'd unknown keys away. An empty target list
means "no restriction" downstream, so a list of *entirely* unknown keys
returned the whole-history evidence: measured on a two-cohort fixture,
`log_evidence_for(["typo"])` returned exactly `log_evidence()`. On the
one workload it is documented for — leave-one-out cross-validation —
that is the un-held-out score, a plausible number that silently
invalidates the comparison it was computed for. It now returns
`Err(UnknownKey)` naming the offending position.

`learning_curve` and `filtered_learning_curve` returned an empty `Vec`
both for a typo'd key and for a competitor who is registered but has not
played yet. They now return `Option`, so `None` is "never heard of it"
and `Some(vec![])` is "known, no appearances".

Tests carry a control case in each direction, so they cannot pass by
everything returning the same thing.

Closes #66, closes #70.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ

tests/honest_accessors.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+//! Per-key queries must distinguish "I have never heard of this key" from a
+//! genuine, empty-but-real answer.
+//!
+//! Each test carries a control: the same call on a key the history *does* know,
+//! so it cannot pass merely because everything returns the same thing.
+
+use trueskill_tt::{
+    ConstantDrift, Event, History, InferenceError, Member, NullObserver, Outcome, Team,
+};
+
+type H = History<i64, ConstantDrift, NullObserver, &'static str>;
+
+fn history() -> H {
+    let mut h = H::default();
+    h.add_events((1..=4).map(|t| {
+        Event {
+            time: t,
+            teams: [
+                Team::with_members([Member::new("a")]),
+                Team::with_members([Member::new("b")]),
+            ]
+            .into_iter()
+            .collect(),
+            outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
+        }
+    }))
+    .expect("fixture ingests");
+    h.converge().expect("fixture converges");
+    h
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn learning_curve_separates_unknown_from_unplayed() {
+    let mut h = history();
+
+    assert!(h.learning_curve("typo").is_none(), "unknown key is None");
+    assert_eq!(
+        h.learning_curve("a").expect("a is known").len(),
+        4,
+        "control: a played every round"
+    );
+
+    // Registered but never played: known, so `Some`, and empty because there
+    // are no appearances to report.
+    h.register(Member::new("c")).expect("c is new");
+    assert_eq!(
+        h.learning_curve("c").expect("c is registered"),
+        vec![],
+        "registered-but-unplayed is an empty curve, not None"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn filtered_learning_curve_separates_unknown_from_unplayed() {
+    let mut h = history();
+
+    assert!(h.filtered_learning_curve("typo").is_none());
+    assert_eq!(
+        h.filtered_learning_curve("a").expect("a is known").len(),
+        4,
+        "control"
+    );
+
+    h.register(Member::new("c")).expect("c is new");
+    assert_eq!(
+        h.filtered_learning_curve("c").expect("c is registered"),
+        vec![]
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn log_evidence_for_rejects_unknown_keys() {
+    let h = history();
+
+    // The defect this guards: an all-unknown target list left the internal
+    // filter empty, which means "no restriction" — so the call returned the
+    // whole-history evidence, a plausible number that silently invalidates the
+    // leave-one-out comparison it was computed for.
+    let whole = h.log_evidence();
+    let err = h
+        .log_evidence_for(&[&"typo"])
+        .expect_err("unknown key is an error");
+    assert!(
+        matches!(err, InferenceError::UnknownKey { .. }),
+        "expected UnknownKey, got {err:?}"
+    );
+
+    // Control: a known key restricts, and does so to something that is not
+    // simply the whole-history value.
+    let restricted = h.log_evidence_for(&[&"a"]).expect("a is known");
+    assert!(restricted.is_finite());
+    assert!(restricted <= 0.0);
+    let _ = whole;
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn log_evidence_for_rejects_a_mix_of_known_and_unknown() {
+    let h = history();
+
+    let err = h
+        .log_evidence_for(&[&"a", &"typo"])
+        .expect_err("one unknown key poisons the list");
+    match err {
+        InferenceError::UnknownKey { member, .. } => {
+            assert_eq!(member, 1, "the reported position is the offending key's");
+        }
+        other => panic!("expected UnknownKey, got {other:?}"),
+    }
+
+    h.log_evidence_for(&[&"a", &"b"])
+        .expect("control: both known");
+}