fix!: per-key queries report unknown keys instead of a plausible constant

Two accessors answered a question about a key the history had never seen
with a well-formed value indistinguishable from a real answer.

`log_evidence_for` filter_map'd unknown keys away. An empty target list
means "no restriction" downstream, so a list of *entirely* unknown keys
returned the whole-history evidence: measured on a two-cohort fixture,
`log_evidence_for(["typo"])` returned exactly `log_evidence()`. On the
one workload it is documented for — leave-one-out cross-validation —
that is the un-held-out score, a plausible number that silently
invalidates the comparison it was computed for. It now returns
`Err(UnknownKey)` naming the offending position.

`learning_curve` and `filtered_learning_curve` returned an empty `Vec`
both for a typo'd key and for a competitor who is registered but has not
played yet. They now return `Option`, so `None` is "never heard of it"
and `Some(vec![])` is "known, no appearances".

Tests carry a control case in each direction, so they cannot pass by
everything returning the same thing.

Closes #66, closes #70.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ

tests/api_shape.rs

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ fn current_skill_and_learning_curve() {
     let b = h.current_skill(&"b").unwrap();
     assert!(b.mu() < 25.0);
 
-    let a_curve = h.learning_curve(&"a");
+    let a_curve = h.learning_curve(&"a").unwrap();
     assert_eq!(a_curve.len(), 2);
     assert_eq!(a_curve[0].0, 1);
     assert_eq!(a_curve[1].0, 2);
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ fn log_evidence_total_vs_subset() {
     h.record_winner(&"a", &"b", 1).unwrap();
     h.record_winner(&"b", &"a", 2).unwrap();
     let total = h.log_evidence();
-    let a_only = h.log_evidence_for(&[&"a"]);
+    let a_only = h.log_evidence_for(&[&"a"]).unwrap();
     assert!(total.is_finite());
     assert!(a_only.is_finite());
 }