feat!: add History::register and History::rating, and reject config conflicts across batches

Three things #38 asked for, on a premise that had half dissolved. The
issue argued from "captured at first appearance", "missing it is silent"
and "missing it is permanent"; 8c087ad made configuration apply whenever
supplied and refit the whole history, so two of those are already gone.
What survived is the literal title — no way to say it before the first
event — plus the absence of any way to check.

`register(Member)` states configuration before anything is observed. It
takes the same `Member` ingestion takes, so there is one vocabulary
rather than two, and it creates the competitor immediately, which is what
makes it observable. It reaches a competitor first seen through
`record_winner`, the route #37 deliberately did not extend.

`rating(&key)` reads back what was stored. Every other accessor reports
what inference inferred; this reports what it was told, which is what
makes a configuration mistake detectable from outside the crate at all.

Conflicting configuration is now an error across batches, not only within
one. The `priors` map is rebuilt per `add_events` call, so a second batch
silently overwrote what a first declared, last-write-wins. That cut
directly against the invariant tests/ingestion_equivalence.rs exists to
protect: the same contradictory events errored when batched and
succeeded, order-dependently, when fed one at a time. Detection lives on
a new `declared` map on `History`, because a `Rating` cannot say whether
a value was chosen or inherited from the defaults — which is exactly the
distinction the check needs. Checked before anything mutates, so a
rejected batch leaves the history untouched.

`register` rejects a non-default `weight` rather than ignoring it. Weight
is per-event and has no meaning on a registration, and silently dropping
a field the caller set is the defect this whole area keeps producing.

The declarative `default_rating_for` closure is not here. It is the
better answer for ustat's actual case — thousands of keys matching a
rule, rather than enumerated — but it adds a `Fn` parameter to `History`,
which the issue itself flags as in tension with the crate's posture. That
wants its own decision rather than riding along.

BREAKING CHANGE: two different values for one competitor's `prior` or
`drift_scale` supplied across separate `add_events` calls now return
`ConflictingCompetitorConfig` instead of silently taking the later one.

Refs #38

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ

tests/registration.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+//! Configuring a competitor before anything is observed about them.
+//!
+//! The configuration a competitor needs is usually a property of the domain —
+//! "every layout is static" — not of whichever event happens to mention them
+//! first. Stating it per-event meant every ingestion path had to remember it,
+//! and two of the four paths could not state it at all.
+
+use smallvec::smallvec;
+use trueskill_tt::{
+    ConstantDrift, ConvergenceOptions, Event, Gaussian, History, InferenceError, Member, Outcome,
+    Team,
+};
+
+type H = History<i64, ConstantDrift, trueskill_tt::NullObserver, &'static str>;
+
+const PINNED: Gaussian = Gaussian::from_ms(2.0, 0.5);
+
+fn history() -> H {
+    History::builder()
+        .mu(0.0)
+        .sigma(6.0)
+        .beta(1.0)
+        .score_sigma(2.0)
+        .drift(ConstantDrift(0.5))
+        .convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
+            max_iter: 20_000,
+            epsilon: 1e-13,
+            alpha: 1.0,
+        })
+        .build()
+}
+
+fn duel(
+    a: &'static str,
+    b: &'static str,
+    t: i64,
+    m: Option<Member<&'static str>>,
+) -> Event<i64, &'static str> {
+    Event {
+        time: t,
+        teams: smallvec![
+            Team::with_members([Member::new(a)]),
+            Team::with_members([m.unwrap_or_else(|| Member::new(b))]),
+        ],
+        outcome: Outcome::scores([5.0, 2.0]),
+    }
+}
+
+fn skills(h: &H) -> Vec<(&'static str, Gaussian)> {
+    ["player", "layout"]
+        .into_iter()
+        .map(|k| (k, h.current_skill(&k).unwrap()))
+        .collect()
+}
+
+/// The headline contract.
+#[test]
+fn registering_matches_configuring_on_the_first_event() {
+    let configured = {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.add_events(vec![
+            duel(
+                "player",
+                "layout",
+                1,
+                Some(
+                    Member::new("layout")
+                        .with_drift_scale(0.0)
+                        .with_prior(PINNED),
+                ),
+            ),
+            duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
+        ])
+        .unwrap();
+        let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
+        h
+    };
+
+    let registered = {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.register(
+            Member::new("layout")
+                .with_drift_scale(0.0)
+                .with_prior(PINNED),
+        )
+        .unwrap();
+        h.add_events(vec![
+            duel("player", "layout", 1, None),
+            duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
+        ])
+        .unwrap();
+        let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
+        h
+    };
+
+    for ((k, a), (_, b)) in skills(&configured).into_iter().zip(skills(&registered)) {
+        assert_eq!(a.pi(), b.pi(), "{k} pi");
+        assert_eq!(a.tau(), b.tau(), "{k} tau");
+    }
+}
+
+/// The case `EventBuilder` and the typed path cannot reach: a competitor whose
+/// first appearance arrives through the two-argument convenience route.
+#[test]
+fn registration_reaches_a_competitor_first_seen_through_record_winner() {
+    let mut h = history();
+    h.register(
+        Member::new("layout")
+            .with_drift_scale(0.0)
+            .with_prior(PINNED),
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+    h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
+    h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 2).unwrap();
+    let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
+
+    let rating = h.rating(&"layout").unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(rating.drift_scale(), 0.0);
+    assert_eq!(rating.prior().mu(), PINNED.mu());
+
+    // Pinned means pinned: no drift across the two slices.
+    let curve = h.learning_curve(&"layout");
+    assert!(curve.len() >= 2);
+    let widest = curve
+        .iter()
+        .map(|(_, g)| g.sigma())
+        .fold(f64::MIN, f64::max);
+    let narrowest = curve
+        .iter()
+        .map(|(_, g)| g.sigma())
+        .fold(f64::MAX, f64::min);
+    assert!(
+        (widest - narrowest) / widest < 1e-9,
+        "{narrowest} .. {widest}"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn registering_a_known_competitor_is_an_error() {
+    let mut h = history();
+    h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
+    let err = h.register(Member::new("layout")).unwrap_err();
+    assert!(
+        matches!(err, InferenceError::AlreadyRegistered { .. }),
+        "{err:?}"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn registering_twice_is_an_error() {
+    let mut h = history();
+    h.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
+        .unwrap();
+    let err = h
+        .register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(1.0))
+        .unwrap_err();
+    assert!(
+        matches!(err, InferenceError::AlreadyRegistered { .. }),
+        "{err:?}"
+    );
+    // The first registration stands.
+    assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
+}
+
+/// `weight` is per-event and meaningless here, so it is rejected rather than
+/// dropped — dropping it silently is the defect class this whole area keeps
+/// producing.
+#[test]
+fn a_weight_on_a_registration_is_rejected() {
+    let mut h = history();
+    let err = h
+        .register(Member::new("layout").with_weight(0.5))
+        .unwrap_err();
+    assert!(
+        matches!(err, InferenceError::InvalidParameter { name: "weight", .. }),
+        "{err:?}"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn an_invalid_drift_scale_on_a_registration_is_rejected() {
+    for bad in [-1.0, f64::NAN, f64::INFINITY] {
+        let mut h = history();
+        let err = h
+            .register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(bad))
+            .unwrap_err();
+        assert!(
+            matches!(
+                err,
+                InferenceError::InvalidParameter {
+                    name: "drift_scale",
+                    ..
+                }
+            ),
+            "{bad}: {err:?}"
+        );
+    }
+}
+
+/// Registration makes the fit independent of the order events arrive in,
+/// which is what the per-event shape could not guarantee.
+#[test]
+fn registration_makes_the_fit_order_independent() {
+    let build = |reversed: bool| {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.register(
+            Member::new("layout")
+                .with_drift_scale(0.0)
+                .with_prior(PINNED),
+        )
+        .unwrap();
+        let mut events = vec![
+            duel("player", "layout", 1, None),
+            duel("player", "layout", 2, None),
+            duel("player", "layout", 3, None),
+        ];
+        if reversed {
+            events.reverse();
+        }
+        h.add_events(events).unwrap();
+        let _ = h.converge().unwrap();
+        h
+    };
+
+    let forward = build(false);
+    let backward = build(true);
+    for ((k, a), (_, b)) in skills(&forward).into_iter().zip(skills(&backward)) {
+        assert_eq!(a.pi(), b.pi(), "{k} pi");
+        assert_eq!(a.tau(), b.tau(), "{k} tau");
+    }
+}
+
+/// `rating` is the read-back that made a configuration mistake detectable from
+/// outside the crate at all. Every other accessor reports what inference
+/// inferred; this reports what it was told.
+#[test]
+fn rating_reads_back_what_was_stored() {
+    let mut h = history();
+    assert!(h.rating(&"nobody").is_none());
+
+    h.register(
+        Member::new("layout")
+            .with_drift_scale(0.25)
+            .with_prior(PINNED),
+    )
+    .unwrap();
+    let r = h.rating(&"layout").unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(r.drift_scale(), 0.25);
+    assert_eq!(r.prior().pi(), PINNED.pi());
+    assert_eq!(r.prior().tau(), PINNED.tau());
+
+    // A competitor created by an event reports the history defaults.
+    h.record_winner(&"player", &"layout", 1).unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(h.rating(&"player").unwrap().drift_scale(), 1.0);
+}
+
+/// The decision this issue turned on: two different values for one competitor
+/// are an error whether they arrive in one batch or two.
+///
+/// Last-write-wins across batches cut against the invariant
+/// `tests/ingestion_equivalence.rs` protects — the same contradictory events
+/// errored when batched and succeeded, order-dependently, one at a time.
+mod conflicting_configuration {
+    use super::*;
+
+    fn seed(scale: f64) -> Event<i64, &'static str> {
+        duel(
+            "player",
+            "layout",
+            1,
+            Some(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(scale)),
+        )
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn within_one_batch_is_an_error() {
+        let mut h = history();
+        let err = h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0), seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
+        assert!(
+            matches!(
+                err,
+                InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig {
+                    field: "drift_scale",
+                    ..
+                }
+            ),
+            "{err:?}"
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn across_two_batches_is_also_an_error() {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
+        let err = h.add_events(vec![seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
+        assert!(
+            matches!(
+                err,
+                InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig {
+                    field: "drift_scale",
+                    ..
+                }
+            ),
+            "{err:?}"
+        );
+        // Rejected before anything mutates: the first declaration stands.
+        assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
+    }
+
+    /// Repeating the *same* value stays inert, which is the expected shape
+    /// when the configuration is a property of the domain.
+    #[test]
+    fn repeating_the_same_value_is_inert() {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
+        h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
+        assert_eq!(h.rating(&"layout").unwrap().drift_scale(), 0.0);
+    }
+
+    /// A registration and a later event that agree are fine; one that
+    /// disagrees is the same error.
+    #[test]
+    fn a_registration_conflicts_with_a_later_event() {
+        let mut h = history();
+        h.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
+            .unwrap();
+        h.add_events(vec![seed(0.0)]).unwrap();
+
+        let mut h2 = history();
+        h2.register(Member::new("layout").with_drift_scale(0.0))
+            .unwrap();
+        let err = h2.add_events(vec![seed(1.0)]).unwrap_err();
+        assert!(
+            matches!(err, InferenceError::ConflictingCompetitorConfig { .. }),
+            "{err:?}"
+        );
+    }
+}