fix!: correct eight wrong # Errors sections and seal the error variants

Documentation (#78). Every item below was measured against the code
rather than read:

- `expected_information_gain` and `predict_ranking` had `# Errors`
  immediately followed by `# Preconditions`, with the error list stranded
  at the bottom of the latter — rustdoc rendered a BLANK Errors section on
  both. The heading now sits with its content.
- `predict_outcome`, `predict_ranking` and the free
  `expected_information_gain` all omitted `GridTooCoarse`.
- `predict_margin` claimed `JointUnavailable` "if the LATEST slice holds
  ranked events". Measured with an early ranked slice and a late scored
  one: it fails. The condition is *any* slice.
- `add_events` documented three errors and can return five more; it also
  claimed a weights `MismatchedShape` that is unreachable through it,
  since weights arrive one-per-`Member`. That check belongs to
  `EventBuilder::weights`, and the doc now says so.
- `converge` and `converge_partial` both omitted the drift-variance
  `InvalidParameter`.

`History` gains a hand-written `Debug` (#76). Summarising, not
exhaustive — a derived one would print every competitor's skill at every
slice. It exists because without it a consumer cannot `#[derive(Debug)]`
on any struct holding a `History`, which is how both known consumers
store one.

`#[non_exhaustive]` on all 17 `InferenceError` struct variants and on
`Outcome::Scored` (#74). The enum carried the attribute; no variant did,
so adding a field to any of them — and downstream construction of any of
them — were both in the public contract. This crate added two variants in
two days.

The options structs are deliberately NOT sealed. `ConvergenceOptions` and
`GameOptions` are constructed by struct literal at 65 sites of which only
8 use `..default()`, and specifying all three convergence fields is a
natural complete statement rather than a partial one. That is a real
trade-off rather than an oversight, and it is left as a decision on #74.

Also spells `UnknownKeys::Reject` explicitly at both sites that
wildcarded it. `#[non_exhaustive]` on your own enum gives no exhaustiveness
safety net if you then match `_`.

Sealing the variants pushed ten test sites from constructing errors to
`matches!`, which is the better assertion anyway — an `assert_eq!` against
a constructed error breaks whenever a field is added, which is the exact
fragility the attribute exists to prevent.

BREAKING CHANGE: `InferenceError`'s struct variants and `Outcome::Scored`
are `#[non_exhaustive]` — downstream patterns need `..` and downstream
construction is no longer possible.

Refs #78, #76, #74

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011hcFjNDmHXZF8URGLku5zZ

tests/prediction.rs

@@ -20,13 +20,13 @@ fn unknown_keys_are_reported_not_silently_dropped() {
     let err = h
         .predict_outcome(&[&[&"a"], &[&"ghost"]])
         .expect_err("an unknown key must not yield a confident prediction");
-    assert_eq!(
-        err,
-        InferenceError::UnknownKey {
-            team: 1,
-            member: 0,
-            key: "\"ghost\"".to_owned(),
-        }
+    assert!(
+        matches!(
+            &err,
+            InferenceError::UnknownKey { team: 1, member: 0, key, .. }
+                if key == "\"ghost\""
+        ),
+        "{err:?}"
     );
 
     // Every prediction entry point, not just one.
@@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ fn unknown_keys_are_reported_not_silently_dropped() {
 fn an_entirely_unknown_team_is_an_error() {
     let h = history_with(&["a", "b"], 0.0);
     let err = h.predict_outcome(&[&[&"a"], &[&"x", &"y"]]).unwrap_err();
-    assert_eq!(
-        err,
-        InferenceError::UnknownKey {
-            team: 1,
-            member: 0,
-            key: "\"x\"".to_owned(),
-        }
+    assert!(
+        matches!(
+            &err,
+            InferenceError::UnknownKey { team: 1, member: 0, key, .. }
+                if key == "\"x\""
+        ),
+        "{err:?}"
     );
 }
 
@@ -56,18 +56,18 @@ fn an_entirely_unknown_team_is_an_error() {
 fn degenerate_team_shapes_are_errors_rather_than_panics() {
     let h = history_with(&["a", "b"], 0.0);
 
-    assert_eq!(
+    assert!(matches!(
         h.predict_outcome(&[&[&"a"]]).unwrap_err(),
-        InferenceError::NotEnoughTeams { got: 1 }
-    );
-    assert_eq!(
+        InferenceError::NotEnoughTeams { got: 1, .. }
+    ),);
+    assert!(matches!(
         h.predict_outcome(&[]).unwrap_err(),
-        InferenceError::NotEnoughTeams { got: 0 }
-    );
-    assert_eq!(
+        InferenceError::NotEnoughTeams { got: 0, .. }
+    ),);
+    assert!(matches!(
         h.predict_outcome(&[&[&"a"], &[]]).unwrap_err(),
-        InferenceError::EmptyTeam { team: 1 }
-    );
+        InferenceError::EmptyTeam { team: 1, .. }
+    ));
 }
 
 #[test]
@@ -93,13 +93,10 @@ fn the_outcome_space_is_capped_rather_than_hanging() {
     let refs: Vec<&[&&str]> = too_many.iter().map(Vec::as_slice).collect();
 
     let err = h.predict_outcome(&refs).unwrap_err();
-    assert_eq!(
+    assert!(matches!(
         err,
-        InferenceError::TooManyTeams {
-            got: 8,
-            max: MAX_PREDICTED_TEAMS
-        }
-    );
+        InferenceError::TooManyTeams { got: 8, max, .. } if max == MAX_PREDICTED_TEAMS
+    ));
 
     // The cheap paths stay available at any size.
     let wins = h.predict_win_probabilities(&refs).unwrap();
@@ -282,15 +279,12 @@ fn information_gain_respects_the_entropy_ceiling() {
 #[test]
 fn information_gain_reports_unknown_keys() {
     let h = history_with(&["a", "b"], 0.0);
-    assert_eq!(
-        h.expected_information_gain(&[&[&"a"], &[&"ghost"]])
+    assert!(matches!(
+        &h.expected_information_gain(&[&[&"a"], &[&"ghost"]])
             .unwrap_err(),
-        InferenceError::UnknownKey {
-            team: 1,
-            member: 0,
-            key: "\"ghost\"".to_owned(),
-        }
-    );
+        InferenceError::UnknownKey { team: 1, member: 0, key, .. }
+            if key == "\"ghost\""
+    ));
 }
 
 /// A draw-enabled history has three outcomes to weigh rather than two, so the