test: add property-based tests, a shared finiteness helper, and boundary inputs
Most of what remained on #26. **Property tests (`tests/properties.rs`, proptest as a dev-dependency).** Four invariants over generated 1v1 schedules rather than hand-written fixtures, which is where this crate's shipped defects actually hid — a linear evidence product that underflowed only past ~1000 teams, and a batching path no golden exercised because every golden ingests in one call: - converged posteriors are always finite with positive sigma - log-evidence, batch and filtered, is finite and never above zero - filtered evidence is invariant to whether `converge` has run - one-at-a-time ingestion reaches the same fixed point as batched The invariance property was mutation-proved: making `filtered_step` read `skill.forward` instead of the carried message fails it with `-1.1038430064192069 -> -1.1135747072822761`. **Shared finiteness helper (`tests/common/mod.rs`).** `assert_finite` was local to `degenerate_inputs.rs`. It now also rejects a non-positive sigma, which the old version let through — `Gaussian::sigma` reports a non-positive precision as improper rather than trapping, so a collapsed posterior would have passed a finite-only check. **Boundary inputs.** Zero and negative weights, out-of-order timestamps, and extreme beta/sigma combinations. Worth recording that zero weight reaches `(m - performance.exclude(..)) * (1.0 / w)` — a division by zero — and the posterior comes out finite anyway; the test pins that rather than asserting what ought to happen. The weight tests `expect()` the commit rather than returning early on error, because an early return would have made them vacuous the moment validation changed. I checked that specifically by turning the return into a failure and confirming it did not fire. Not done, and left on #26: benchmark regression gating. Nothing fails on a regression today; making it fail needs a threshold chosen against how noisy the shared runner is, which is a policy call rather than a mechanical one. 60 test binaries, up from 56. MSRV 1.85 verified with proptest in the graph. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T5SYDExxL4vZgvunrcNSMc
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
|
||||
//! Property-based tests over generated histories.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! The golden suite pins exact values against the Python/Julia reference on a
|
||||
//! handful of fixtures. These pin *invariants* over inputs nobody wrote by
|
||||
//! hand, which is where the defects this crate has actually shipped were
|
||||
//! hiding: a linear evidence product that underflowed only past ~1000 teams,
|
||||
//! and a batching path no golden exercised because every golden ingests in one
|
||||
//! call.
|
||||
|
||||
mod common;
|
||||
|
||||
use common::assert_finite;
|
||||
use proptest::prelude::*;
|
||||
use smallvec::smallvec;
|
||||
use trueskill_tt::{ConvergenceOptions, Event, History, Member, Outcome, Team};
|
||||
|
||||
/// Distinct competitors, so no event pits someone against themselves.
|
||||
fn pairs() -> impl Strategy<Value = Vec<(usize, usize)>> {
|
||||
prop::collection::vec((0usize..8, 0usize..8), 1..24)
|
||||
.prop_map(|v| v.into_iter().filter(|(a, b)| a != b).collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.prop_filter("needs at least one valid pair", |v| !v.is_empty())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const KEYS: [&str; 8] = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h"];
|
||||
|
||||
fn history_from(games: &[(usize, usize)]) -> History {
|
||||
let mut h = History::builder()
|
||||
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
|
||||
max_iter: 200,
|
||||
epsilon: 1e-10,
|
||||
..ConvergenceOptions::default()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
|
||||
let events: Vec<Event<i64, &'static str>> = games
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.enumerate()
|
||||
.map(|(i, &(a, b))| Event {
|
||||
time: i as i64 + 1,
|
||||
teams: smallvec![
|
||||
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[a])]),
|
||||
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[b])]),
|
||||
],
|
||||
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect();
|
||||
|
||||
h.add_events(events).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
h
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
proptest! {
|
||||
#![proptest_config(ProptestConfig::with_cases(48))]
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whatever the schedule of games, convergence must not produce NaN or an
|
||||
/// improper posterior. `converge` returns `NonFiniteResult` rather than
|
||||
/// silently reporting a NaN step as converged, so a break shows up here as
|
||||
/// either an Err or a non-finite curve point.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn converged_posteriors_are_always_finite(games in pairs()) {
|
||||
let mut h = history_from(&games);
|
||||
|
||||
h.converge().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
for key in KEYS {
|
||||
for (time, g) in h.learning_curve(key) {
|
||||
assert_finite(g, &format!("{key} at t={time}"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Log-evidence is a log probability: finite, and never above zero.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The linear-product implementation this replaced underflowed to zero on
|
||||
/// long chains, making `ln(0)` = -inf — finite-ness is the property that
|
||||
/// would have caught it.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn log_evidence_is_a_finite_log_probability(games in pairs()) {
|
||||
let mut h = history_from(&games);
|
||||
|
||||
h.converge().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let batch = h.log_evidence();
|
||||
let filtered = h.filtered_log_evidence();
|
||||
|
||||
prop_assert!(batch.is_finite(), "batch log-evidence {batch} is not finite");
|
||||
prop_assert!(batch <= 0.0, "batch log-evidence {batch} exceeds zero");
|
||||
prop_assert!(filtered.is_finite(), "filtered log-evidence {filtered} is not finite");
|
||||
prop_assert!(filtered <= 0.0, "filtered log-evidence {filtered} exceeds zero");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Filtered estimates must not depend on whether `converge` has run — the
|
||||
/// property the whole forward-only design rests on.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn filtered_evidence_is_invariant_to_convergence(games in pairs()) {
|
||||
let mut h = history_from(&games);
|
||||
|
||||
let before = h.filtered_log_evidence();
|
||||
|
||||
h.converge().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
let after = h.filtered_log_evidence();
|
||||
|
||||
prop_assert!(
|
||||
(before - after).abs() < 1e-8,
|
||||
"filtered evidence moved across converge(): {before} -> {after}"
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Ingesting the same games one at a time must reach the same fixed point
|
||||
/// as ingesting them in one call.
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn ingestion_order_does_not_change_the_answer(games in pairs()) {
|
||||
let batched = {
|
||||
let mut h = history_from(&games);
|
||||
h.converge().unwrap();
|
||||
h
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let incremental = {
|
||||
let mut h = History::builder()
|
||||
.convergence(ConvergenceOptions {
|
||||
max_iter: 200,
|
||||
epsilon: 1e-10,
|
||||
..ConvergenceOptions::default()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
|
||||
for (i, &(a, b)) in games.iter().enumerate() {
|
||||
h.add_events([Event {
|
||||
time: i as i64 + 1,
|
||||
teams: smallvec![
|
||||
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[a])]),
|
||||
Team::with_members([Member::new(KEYS[b])]),
|
||||
],
|
||||
outcome: Outcome::winner(0, 2),
|
||||
}])
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
h.converge().unwrap();
|
||||
h
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
for key in KEYS {
|
||||
let one = batched.current_skill(key);
|
||||
let other = incremental.current_skill(key);
|
||||
|
||||
match (one, other) {
|
||||
(Some(one), Some(other)) => {
|
||||
prop_assert!(
|
||||
(one.mu() - other.mu()).abs() < 1e-6
|
||||
&& (one.sigma() - other.sigma()).abs() < 1e-6,
|
||||
"{key}: batched mu={} sigma={}, incremental mu={} sigma={}",
|
||||
one.mu(),
|
||||
one.sigma(),
|
||||
other.mu(),
|
||||
other.sigma()
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
(None, None) => {}
|
||||
_ => prop_assert!(false, "{key} present in only one history"),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user